Kodak EasyShare C180 10.2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom and 2.4 inch LCD – Red

Kodak EasyShare C180 10.2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom and 2.4 inch LCD – Red

Posted on 09. Feb, 2010 by admin in Cameras

c13e1e09d3bdfccf0ab6f697890d94ea Kodak EasyShare C180 10.2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom and 2.4 inch LCD   Red
  • 10.2-megapixel resolution for stunning prints up to 30 x 40 inches
  • Kodak AF 3x optical aspheric zoom lens (35 mm equivalent: 32 - 96 mm)
  • Capture beautiful HD pictures in 16:9 format; view in high definition on an HDTV or other HD device
  • 2.4-inch LCD screen; Face Detection, Blur Reduction features
  • Capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards (not included)

Too low to display
Product Description
10.2 megapixels for stunning prints up to 30 x 40-inch. More megapixels means you can crop and still get a great picture. However you choose to print - at home, at retail, or online - trust Kodak for picture quality that's truly exceptional and for memories that will last.The C180 is part of the Kodak EASYSHARE system, so sharing your pictures is amazingly simple. Just press share.
6671bc6f33e4dacd9b8dc784db6f4287 Kodak EasyShare C180 10.2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom and 2.4 inch LCD   Red

Kodak EasyShare C180 10.2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom and 2.4 inch LCD - Red

Related Posts

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Kodak EasyShare C180 10.2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom and 2.4 inch LCD – Red”

  1. Mary B. Snyder

    09. Feb, 2010

    No Card, No instructions booklet, very very low internal memory. I bought it, took it to an even, and could not use it. Seller did not offer a card to me. Even my cheapie HP and Take-It digital cameras came with cards.

    I returned the item.
    Rating: 1 / 5

  2. R. A. Farver

    09. Feb, 2010

    I took 6 photos, and got the “memory full” signal. Also, the viewfinder was not a good indicator of what the picture would be. My granddaughter says it is “clunky” for what it does (not much), and it should have a battery charger. On “ease of use”, I would give it a 1 out of 10.
    Rating: 1 / 5

  3. jack crossfire

    09. Feb, 2010

    For this amount of money, you can get a Canon with much better quality. The Kodaks have light leaks so when pointed perpendicular to the sun, you get red blobs. The Kodaks shoot 640×240 & upscale it. There’s no manual control of anything. Picture quality sux. Video encoding sux. Red blobs suck.
    Rating: 1 / 5

  4. Padre Pete

    09. Feb, 2010

    My camera came in time for Christmas and was the worst piece of equipment I have ever recieved. It would only take and store two pics…quality bad…,it would not save backups to the disk and the fully charged battery kept running out after 5 minutes. It seems I got the only lemon of these; I’ve sent it back to amazon for my refund and will buy another camera at a reputable dealer.

    Rating: 1 / 5

  5. L. Pauling

    09. Feb, 2010

    This camera takes terrible pictures!!! I purchased it because I make the school’s yearbook, and it’s useless! If I use the “auto” setting to get enough light in the pictures, the people are grainy or blurry. If I use the “action” setting to reduce the blur, then the pictures are underexposed. In some situations, these amorphous white dots of light just appear in the pictures.

    I have tried every setting available and nothing helps. I have missed so many cute shots that would have been wonderful and cannot be reproduced this year.

    Having bought a Kodak Easyshare C model years ago, which took AMAZING pictures and just flat wore out, I thought this one would do the same…big mistake. Do NOT buy this camera!
    Rating: 1 / 5

Leave a Reply